Letter to St. Ed’s University by David Swann of Travis Heights:
I received a mailed copy of your August 9 letter yesterday. The message is disturbing, and I wish to respond. In general, I believe the administration has lost its focus as an educational institution. …
We are asking for St. Edward’s to consider the long term effects on the tax supported infrastructure they depend on in our neighborhood. We oppose commercializing Sherwood Oaks by building a shipping and receiving dock fronting our street. This might be good for St. Edward’s business but it is not good for our neighborhood or our city.
In Austin (zip 78704), the median household income is $50,248. In Sherwood Oaks, the average property tax bill is $9000. Average rent in South Congress/Sherwood Oaks is $2000 a month. This is because property tax has shot up tremendously and that is passed on to renter. Sherwood Oaks neighbors pay a large part of their income in taxes in support of streets, water and drainage infrastructure that are being “repurposed” to support the profits of St. Edward’s, tax exempt business.St. Edward’s made a 26,000,000 profit last year but is tax exempt.
You can find pictures and links to news reports about the St. Ed’s construction project and our protest at this public facebook page: NO 2 St. Ed’s
Below is a summary of our interaction with St. Ed’s up until our meeting August 5th, at which time they merely reiterated their claim that this building will not create undue stress and traffic in the neighborhood. This is by Gretchen Otto, SRCC president:
At the August general meeting, SRCC Area Coordinator Elloa Mathews gave a presentation about St. Edward’s University’s plans to build a new operations building on St. Edward’s Drive. Their plans for an operations building include having truck deliveries on St. Edward’s Drive, both box-type smaller delivery trucks and full sized 18-wheel semi tractor trailers. Nearby neighbors have serious concerns about the effects of this heavy truck traffic in an entirely residential neighborhood (Sherwood Oaks). Here is some background information on the issue:
Earlier this year, the university announced plans to build a new building but it was unclear what exact uses the building would have. In March, SRCC received a notice from the city that plans were filed, stating that it would be a general operations building encompassing many uses such as police, purchasing, and receiving. We requested more information/a meeting with administrators at St. Ed’s, and explaining our concerns about traffic and public safety on St. Edwards Drive, and received only cursory emails containing statements such as “There will be no new additional traffic resulting from these projects being completed.”
At the beginning of June, neighbors discovered that the bonds for this and other construction would have to go through the city council. Ms. Mathews requested a vote of the EC on June 7 to leverage this opportunity by asking the city council for help with encouraging the university to respond to our concerns. The EC voted on June 8 to send a letter to council. The text of the letter can be read here. The letter did successfully get everyone’s attention and a meeting was quickly scheduled between various neighbors and representatives from the university for June 13, at which the neighbors explained their concerns over traffic and safety on St. Edward’s Drive.
At no point during the meeting did the representatives indicate that the building they have planned will be increasing traffic and introducing large truck traffic to the neighborhood. After the meeting, we discovered that the university knew all along that they would be having truck deliveries to the new building, and had requested a Right-of-Way (ROW) waiver from the city so that they could use the dead-end of St. Edwards Drive for the large trucks to turn around (because the site cannot accommodate turn-arounds).
Following the June 13 meeting, SRCC President Gretchen Otto wrote a letter to the university, describing in detail all of the neighbor’s concerns about traffic and safety on St. Edward’s Drive and giving suggestions for specific things the university could do to help alleviate the negative effects.
After many repeated attempts to find out more information from the city, without receiving any help, neighbors were becoming increasingly concerned about the situation. As more and more people found out about the plans, opposition grew during July. When Ms. Mathews gave her presentation at the August 1 general meeting, the members voted to pass a resolution stating our opposition to having such a large commercial operation right in the heart of Sherwood Oaks. Here is the text of the resolution: